TOWARD A COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY FRAMEWORK
Paul Mansell
Challenges in Delivering IT Quality
Irrespective of how advanced technology becomes, enterprises and their IT departments face ever-present staple challenges in delivering high-quality technology solutions to their users. In broader terms, these challenges can be described as follows:
1. Low Test Maturity Across the Enterprise
- Lack of formalised test policies and standards leads to inconsistent approaches to quality.
- Testing processes vary in rigour and efficiency across teams.
- Poor or no oversight of testing activities results in inefficiencies and unobserved risks.
- Repeated cycles of poor practice persist, with little to no lessons learned.
2. Fragmented Delivery Practices
- Siloed project and operational teams create gaps between quality objectives and delivery outcomes.
- Testing is frequently treated as an afterthought, increasing the likelihood of late-stage defects and delays.
- Poor communication and inadequate team coordination constrains opportunities to gain knowledge and understanding, delaying issue resolution or missing issues altogether.
3. Scalability and Resourcing Issues
- A lack of skilled personnel and expertise hinders the organisation’s ability to achieve consistent test quality.
- Limited access to tools and infrastructure restricts the scalability of quality practices across programmes and projects.
- Over-reliance on manual Testing increases inefficiencies and operational costs due to limited test automation.
- Bottlenecks in resource allocation, such as unprepared testing environments and data, lead to delivery delays.
4. Weak Supplier Assurance and Accountability
- Inadequate contractual coverage for quality-related obligations creates gaps in supplier accountability, allowing critical risks to go unaddressed.
- Ambiguous acceptance criteria and unclear quality benchmarks result in disputes over deliverables.
- Limited oversight of supplier testing makes establishing accountability and effectively addressing quality risks difficult.
5. Limited Visibility and Insight into Quality
- Quality-related data is scattered across teams, making it difficult to manage and measure progress or outcomes.
- A lack of centralised monitoring adversely impacts the ability to evaluate real-time perspectives, preventing the timely identification of risks and strategy adjustments.
- Limited actionable metrics hinder the ability to identify quality issues, process hotspots, or make informed decisions.
6. High Rates of Project and Programme Failure
- Testing often lacks a strategic view, leading to misaligned quality expectations, risks, and management controls.
- A lack of test planning and design results in insufficient coverage, misunderstood priorities, and a higher likelihood of defects escaping into production.
- Ineffective risk management and a failure to address risks early cause cascading issues throughout delivery.
- Defects discovered late in the lifecycle lead to costly rework and delays, inflating budgets and disrupting timelines.
Despite these commonly persistent issues, many IT Change delivery organisations fall into the trap of assuming that ‘Quality’ is being adequately addressed somewhere within the process—typically through isolated, on-demand test activities conducted at the operational level. This reactive, fragmented approach is insufficient to address the breadth and complexity of today’s technology delivery challenges.
Fully overcoming these challenges requires a significant shift: moving from disconnected, ad hoc testing efforts to a structured, integrated Quality and Test Framework that embeds quality into every layer of the delivery process.
Building a Cohesive Framework
To address these systemic challenges, enterprises require a unified approach that embeds quality into every level of delivery. A well-designed quality and test framework will bridge the gaps between management capabilities and communications, orienting quality and test activities with strategic objectives and operational realities.
Core Capabilities, Processes, and Practices by Management Layer
The strength of any organisation’s approach to Quality and Testing lies in its ability to operate across multiple dimensions—addressing the immediate demands of projects while facilitating long-term strategic objectives. A well-designed framework integrates Governance, Oversight, Delivery Management, and Exceptions Handling, creating a robust multi-layered mechanism. Each layer—strategic, tactical, and dynamic—plays a unique role, providing critical support to leadership, delivery teams, and operational activities.
Strategic Layer: Governance for Enterprise-Level Success
The strategic layer embeds quality into the organisation’s decision-making process. Governance equips senior leadership with practical intel through metrics, dashboards, and analytics generated from test results and quality risk data. These tools enable executives to make informed decisions about priorities, investments, and risks.
For example, a governance function ensures that a high-priority customer engagement initiative focuses on high-risk areas, such as system integration. By identifying potential bottlenecks early, leadership can prioritise resources and confidently meet critical market deadlines.
Tactical Layer: Overseeing Delivery Excellence
The tactical layer bridges the gap between strategy and execution, ensuring that delivery mechanisms operate cohesively and with quality embedded at every step. Oversight activities such as test assurance, audits, and GAP analyses create transparency and predictability for delivery teams, enabling them to address risks and optimise resources.
Consider a tactical team that identifies resource constraints in a high-priority initiative by analysing assurance reports. The team reallocates resources and adjusts timelines to ensure delivery remains on track without compromising quality.
ENQUIRE ABOUT OUR MENTORING PROGRAMMES
TAKE THE TAL ONLINE TEST MATURITY SURVEY
Dynamic Layer: Operational Precision and Recording
On the ground, the dynamic layer ensures rigorous execution of testing activities, from defect triage to test lifecycle management, while maintaining accurate records of test results and quality risk data. This layer provides the foundation for tactical oversight and strategic governance.
Imagine that during a system rollout, dynamic teams detect recurring defects. By logging this data systematically, they generate information that can be appraised and escalated to the tactical layer, enabling mid-project corrections that save both time and costs.
The Framework: Standardised Processes, Practices, and Deliverables
A quality and test framework is not simply a collection of activities but an organised entity composed of standardised processes, structured practices, and tangible deliverables.
Standardised Processes
- Test Lifecycle Management: Governs the end-to-end testing process, from planning to execution and closure.
- Defect Triage and Resolution: Standardises how issues are identified, prioritised, and resolved.
Structured Practices
- Test Architecture: Positions testing activities in line with organisational priorities alongside other critical practices.
- Quality Risk Governance: Identifies, captures and controls risks at all levels of the quality and test organisation.
- Test Realisation and Execution: Ensures precision implementation and running of test cycle schedules.
Tangible Deliverables
- Test Architecture: Positions testing activities in line with organisational priorities alongside other critical practices.
- Quality Risk Governance: Identifies, captures and controls risks at all levels of the quality and test organisation.
- Test Realisation and Execution: Ensures precision implementation and running of test cycle schedules.
Delivering Value Across the Enterprise
A cohesive quality and test framework promotes a broad spectrum of positive outcomes—it is the foundation for sustained enterprise excellence. By integrating standardised processes, structured practices, and tangible deliverables across dynamic, tactical, and strategic layers, the framework ensures that every action contributes to enterprise-wide goals.
Its transformative impact reaches every level of the organisation to deliver value where it matters most:
Key Outcomes
- Strategic Cohesion: The framework aligns quality activities with key business outcomes, such as faster time-to-market, reduced risks, and enhanced customer satisfaction. For example, centralised governance provides senior leadership with actionable insights derived from aggregated test results and risk data, addressing challenges such as limited visibility into quality (Challenge 5). These insights allow organisations to prioritise investments and identify systemic risks before they escalate.
- Operational Efficiency: High-cost, inefficient processes are replaced with streamlined, repeatable practices that optimise resource utilisation and reduce waste. For instance, introducing automated defect triage reduces manual workloads, addressing bottlenecks and inefficiencies caused by resource constraints (Challenge 3). This fosters productivity and minimises delays.
- Scalability and Flexibility: Designed to evolve with the organisation’s needs, the framework adapts to dynamic environments. Whether supporting immediate priorities, such as a critical programme launch or enabling longer-term growth through automation, it mitigates scalability issues (Challenge 3) while maintaining consistency across fragmented delivery models (Challenge 2).
- Enhanced Visibility and Accountability: Centralised governance and oversight ensure decision-makers have access to real-time information. Transparent metrics and reporting foster accountability at all levels, enabling leadership to make informed, data-driven decisions. This directly tackles the challenge of scattered data and poor communication (Challenges 2 and 5).
- Continuous Improvement: At its core, the framework fosters a culture of innovation. By creating seamless feedback loops between layers, it addresses persistent poor practices and inefficiencies (Challenge 1). Lessons learned and quality metrics drive ongoing refinement, helping enterprises maintain a competitive edge.
- Improved Programme and Project Success Rates: By embedding governance practices, test assurance mechanisms, and risk mitigation strategies, the framework ensures project goals are in tune with quality benchmarks. This significantly reduces the risk of late-stage defects and costly rework, addressing high rates of project and programme failure (Challenge 6). For instance, test planning at the tactical level ensures sufficient coverage geared towards addressing organisational priorities, preventing cascading delivery issues.
Connecting the Layers for Integrated Outcomes
The value of the framework lies in its ability to integrate processes across layers. For instance, if test results data, captured at the dynamic (operational) layer, identifies a recurring defect-trend, these findings can, in turn, inform tactical decisions, e.g., the reallocation of resources to high-priority areas or the introduction of new supplier accountability measures (Challenge 4). At the strategic layer, these insights empower leadership – for example, to invest in automation or adjust broader quality policies, ensuring alignment with enterprise objectives.
This continuous flow of data and appraisal bridges the gap between operational execution and strategic governance, ensuring that quality is embedded into every decision and activity.
From Challenges to Excellence
Enterprises no longer need to struggle with inefficiencies, fragmented processes, or reactive practices that undermine delivery goals. A cohesive Quality and Test Framework offers a clear path to excellence, addressing immediate challenges while laying the foundation for sustained success.
By embedding structured practices across dynamic, tactical, and strategic layers, the framework transforms how organisations approach quality. For example, it provides immediate solutions to challenges such as weak supplier accountability by standardising test assurance practices. At the same time, long-term resilience against scalability and resource issues is fostered through proactive planning.
The true strength of this framework lies in its ability to integrate quality management into every facet of delivery. A continuous feedback cycle facilitates the seamless flow of data across layers, transforming grassroots data into actionable management and executive-level information. This process directly influences senior decision-making and strategic investments, ensuring cost reduction, risk mitigation, and the cultivation of stakeholder trust.
As organisations navigate increasingly complex and dynamic environments, this adaptive framework positions them to thrive. By embedding governance, driving innovation, and empowering stakeholders at every level, enterprises can achieve not only their immediate delivery goals but also a culture of continuous improvement and innovation. With a firm foundation of management control and a commitment to adaptability, success is not merely aspirational but a consistent and measurable reality.
Contact us for expert guidance on developing quality management capabilities and practices.
TAKE THE TAL ONLINE TEST MATURITY SURVEY
ENQUIRE ABOUT OUR MENTORING PROGRAMMES
Sign Up for Regular Comms and Updates
Get the latest breaking developments delivered straight to your inbox.
Share this Article
Posted by Paul Mansell
We're Here To Help!
Office
85 Great Portland Street, First Floor, London, England, W1W 7LT
Hours
M-F: 09:00 – 17:00
S-S: Closed
0 Comments